<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High intensity v low intensity training for the heart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canute1.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/high-intensity-v-low-intesnity-training-for-the-heart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canute1.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/high-intensity-v-low-intesnity-training-for-the-heart/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:53:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ewen</title>
		<link>http://canute1.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/high-intensity-v-low-intesnity-training-for-the-heart/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canute1.wordpress.com/?p=623#comment-531</guid>
		<description>A correction, just checked the book and his 200 recoveries were in 45 secs, between 400s of 62-64 seconds, so 3:45/k pace for the recoveries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A correction, just checked the book and his 200 recoveries were in 45 secs, between 400s of 62-64 seconds, so 3:45/k pace for the recoveries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewen</title>
		<link>http://canute1.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/high-intensity-v-low-intesnity-training-for-the-heart/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canute1.wordpress.com/?p=623#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Thanks Canute. Higher intensity does sound more efficient as &#039;heart training&#039;, although the body would need to be &#039;mechanically&#039; strong enough to withstand the demands of such training.

The short recovery intervals would seem very useful to avoid the myoglobin effect - I know sessions like &#039;Mona fartlek&#039; and &#039;Deek 400s&#039; use fairly fast float recoveries between hard efforts - in the case of Deek, his 200 recoveries were in 40 secs (3:20/k pace).

Thanks for your comment on the video - it&#039;s always interesting to see where people run. The countryside is actually a little greener than it has been! I&#039;ll do one in drier times for comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Canute. Higher intensity does sound more efficient as &#8216;heart training&#8217;, although the body would need to be &#8216;mechanically&#8217; strong enough to withstand the demands of such training.</p>
<p>The short recovery intervals would seem very useful to avoid the myoglobin effect &#8211; I know sessions like &#8216;Mona fartlek&#8217; and &#8216;Deek 400s&#8217; use fairly fast float recoveries between hard efforts &#8211; in the case of Deek, his 200 recoveries were in 40 secs (3:20/k pace).</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment on the video &#8211; it&#8217;s always interesting to see where people run. The countryside is actually a little greener than it has been! I&#8217;ll do one in drier times for comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
